The SABRhood
  • Home
  • Today
  • Standings
  • Leaders
  • Awards
    • MLB Award Races
    • Insane Baseball Awards
  • Intelligence
    • Story Engine
    • Players
    • Player Change Engine
    • Career Path Engine
    • Teams
    • Team reports
    • Matchups
    • Pitch Lab
    • Run Game
    • Fielding
    • Triple-A Watch
    • History
    • History Match
    • League Trends
  • Projections
  • Newsletter
  • Graphics
  • Editorials
  • Broadcast
  • About

Player Market

A development view of MLB role quality, supply, scarcity, and team need.

League talent economy

How difficult is it to find this kind of player?

The Player Market compares the quality and depth of MLB role groups with the number of clubs that need help there. It begins with the baseball question; contract price and acquisition cost will be added only when those inputs have a dependable source.

Development preview

This is a talent-supply market, not yet a transaction market

The first release measures how much credible MLB talent exists in each role and how many clubs currently grade as needing help there. Salary, service time, options, years of control, free-agent status, and trade availability will remain blank until a reliable contract and transaction source is connected.

League role market

Where quality is plentiful—and where teams are chasing a thin pool

Every pool is scaled to the number of 26-man roster jobs it must fill. Five rotation places and eight bullpen places per club are divided by handedness; the remaining 13 roster places are allocated across catcher, infield, outfield, and designated hitter roles.

Scarce talent pool100.0 scarcity

Designated hitters

Roster slots / club1.0Qualified coverage57%Upper-half coverage30%

Pool: 17 qualified players for 30 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 1.4 WAR / 600 PA

Pool leadersYordan Alvarez · Trevor Larnach · Seiya Suzuki
Scarce talent pool90.9 scarcity

Shortstops

Roster slots / club1.5Qualified coverage80%Upper-half coverage40%

Pool: 36 qualified players for 45 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 2.6 WAR / 600 PA

Pool leadersBobby Witt Jr. · Jeremy Peña · Elly De La Cruz
Scarce talent pool81.8 scarcity

Catchers

Roster slots / club2.0Qualified coverage92%Upper-half coverage47%

Pool: 55 qualified players for 60 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 2.0 WAR / 600 PA

Pool leadersDillon Dingler · Ryan Jeffers · Gabriel Moreno
Balanced talent pool72.7 scarcity

Outfielders

Roster slots / club4.2Qualified coverage104%Upper-half coverage52%

Pool: 132 qualified players for 128 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 1.7 WAR / 600 PA

Pool leadersPete Crow-Armstrong · Esmerlyn Valdez · Wyatt Langford
Balanced talent pool63.6 scarcity

Third basemen

Roster slots / club1.5Qualified coverage104%Upper-half coverage53%

Pool: 47 qualified players for 45 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 1.5 WAR / 600 PA

Pool leadersKevin McGonigle · Ezequiel Duran · Junior Caminero
Balanced talent pool50.0 scarcity

Starting LHP

Roster slots / club1.4Qualified coverage112%Upper-half coverage56%

Pool: 48 qualified players for 43 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 2.8 WAR / 180 IP

Pool leadersRanger Suarez · Max Fried · Cristopher Sánchez
Balanced talent pool50.0 scarcity

Starting RHP

Roster slots / club3.6Qualified coverage112%Upper-half coverage56%

Pool: 120 qualified players for 107 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 2.3 WAR / 180 IP

Pool leadersJacob Misiorowski · Dylan Cease · Shohei Ohtani
Deep talent pool36.4 scarcity

First basemen

Roster slots / club1.2Qualified coverage112%Upper-half coverage56%

Pool: 42 qualified players for 38 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 2.6 WAR / 600 PA

Pool leadersLuis Arraez · Max Muncy · Munetaka Murakami
Deep talent pool22.7 scarcity

Relief LHP

Roster slots / club2.4Qualified coverage124%Upper-half coverage62%

Pool: 90 qualified players for 72 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 0.5 WAR / 65 IP

Pool leadersJosh Hader · Jacob Latz · Samy Natera Jr.
Deep talent pool22.7 scarcity

Relief RHP

Roster slots / club5.6Qualified coverage124%Upper-half coverage62%

Pool: 208 qualified players for 168 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 0.3 WAR / 65 IP

Pool leadersMason Miller · Jhoan Duran · Nick Pivetta
Deep talent pool9.1 scarcity

Second basemen

Roster slots / club1.5Qualified coverage136%Upper-half coverage69%

Pool: 61 qualified players for 45 estimated MLB roster jobs; 10 clubs currently grade as needing help. Quality bar: 1.6 WAR / 600 PA

Pool leadersOtto Lopez · Tommy Edman · Brice Turang
Example market: starting left-handers

Who establishes the current quality and workload bar?

This is the available MLB talent pool in the analytical sense; it does not claim that any listed pitcher is obtainable.

Pitcher Team Age Workload WAR Role-adjusted quality Scale
Ranger Suarez BOS 30.0 95.3 IP 3.2 6.1 WAR / 180 IP
Max Fried NYY 32.0 66.7 IP 2.2 5.9 WAR / 180 IP
Cristopher Sánchez PHI 29.0 138.7 IP 4.4 5.7 WAR / 180 IP
Chris Sale ATL 37.0 111 IP 3.5 5.7 WAR / 180 IP
Tarik Skubal DET 29.0 90 IP 2.6 5.3 WAR / 180 IP
Jesús Luzardo PHI 28.0 122.3 IP 3.5 5.2 WAR / 180 IP
Kyle Harrison MIL 24.0 83.7 IP 2.2 4.7 WAR / 180 IP
Jake Bennett BOS 25.0 59.3 IP 1.6 4.7 WAR / 180 IP
Parker Messick CLE 25.0 125.3 IP 3.3 4.7 WAR / 180 IP
Justin Wrobleski LAD 25.0 106.7 IP 2.7 4.6 WAR / 180 IP
Payton Tolle BOS 23.0 89.7 IP 2.3 4.6 WAR / 180 IP
Reid Detmers LAA 26.0 120 IP 3.0 4.5 WAR / 180 IP
Andrew Alvarez WSN 27.0 53.3 IP 1.3 4.4 WAR / 180 IP
Shane Drohan MIL 27.0 82 IP 1.9 4.2 WAR / 180 IP
Shane McClanahan TBR 29.0 96 IP 2.2 4.1 WAR / 180 IP
Yusei Kikuchi LAA 35.0 31 IP 0.7 3.8 WAR / 180 IP
Trevor Rogers BAL 28.0 103.7 IP 2.2 3.7 WAR / 180 IP
Carlos Rodón NYY 33.0 46.3 IP 0.9 3.7 WAR / 180 IP
Matthew Boyd CHC 35.0 59 IP 1.2 3.7 WAR / 180 IP
MacKenzie Gore TEX 27.0 115.7 IP 2.1 3.3 WAR / 180 IP
Future licensed layerWhat do these players go for?

That answer needs contract value, remaining control, option status, transaction history, and actual availability. Once sourced, the page can estimate dollars per projected win, acquisition cost by role, and the premium created by scarcity without confusing performance with price.

Roster-adjusted formula: qualified pools use at least 100 PA for hitters, 30 IP for starters, and 15 IP for relievers. Role quality is WAR normalized to 600 PA, 180 starter innings, or 65 relief innings. Qualified and upper-half supply are divided by estimated league roster jobs, while club need is multiplied by the number of roster slots required for that role. The scarcity score combines the qualified-player gap, the upper-half talent gap, and need-weighted slot pressure.

Review every player Open team needs

© 2026 The SABRhood

  • Methodology

  • Glossary

  • History Desk

  • @thesabrhood